1983 Talbot 1510 vs. 2011 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2011 Ford Ranger is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Talbot 1510. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Talbot 1510 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Ranger (207 HP) has 133 more horse power than 1983 Talbot 1510. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1983 Talbot 1510.
Because 2011 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Talbot 1510, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Ranger (322 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Talbot 1510. (122 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2011 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Talbot 1510.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Talbot 1510 | 2011 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Talbot | Ford |
Model | 1510 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1983 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1442 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 207 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 322 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3193 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 74 L |