1983 Toyota Camry vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Camry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Camry would be higher. At 1,832 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Megane (112 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Camry. (89 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Camry.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Megane (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Camry. (145 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Toyota Camry | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Toyota | Renault |
Model | Camry | Megane |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1832 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 80.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |