1983 Toyota Camry vs. 2011 Holden UTE
To start off, 2011 Holden UTE is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Camry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Camry would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 268 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Camry. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Camry.
Because 2011 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 387 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Camry. (143 Nm). This means 2011 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Toyota Camry | 2011 Holden UTE | |
Make | Toyota | Holden |
Model | Camry | UTE |
Year Released | 1983 | 2011 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1832 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 143 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |