1983 Toyota Celica vs. 2010 Volvo V50
To start off, 2010 Volvo V50 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1983 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo V50 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo V50 weights approximately 418 kg more than 1983 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo V50 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo V50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Toyota Celica | 2010 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Celica | V50 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2563 cc | 2500 cc |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1598 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4521 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2639 mm |