1983 Toyota Corona vs. 2006 Holden Epica

To start off, 2006 Holden Epica is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Corona. (116 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Corona.

Because 1983 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Corona. (198 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Corona. 2006 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1983 Toyota Corona has manual transmission. 1983 Toyota Corona will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: