1983 Toyota Cressida vs. 2011 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2011 Lotus Evora is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Cressida would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Lotus Evora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Cressida. (104 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Cressida.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Lotus Evora (349 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Cressida. (162 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2011 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Cressida.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Toyota Cressida | 2011 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Toyota | Lotus |
Model | Cressida | Evora |
Year Released | 1983 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1972 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 349 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4341 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1222 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2576 mm |