1983 Volkswagen Polo vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1983 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 102 (67 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1983 Volkswagen Polo. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1983 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Zastava 102 weights approximately 74 kg more than 1983 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Volkswagen Polo | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Volkswagen | Zastava |
Model | Polo | 102 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1043 cc | 1302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 774 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2160 mm |