1983 Volvo 240 vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,127 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1983 Volvo 240. (122 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1983 Volvo 240.
Because 1983 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Volvo 240. (170 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Volvo 240 | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Volvo | Holden |
Model | 240 | Epica |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2127 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 170 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2700 mm |