1983 Westfield ZEI vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Westfield ZEI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Westfield ZEI would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Westfield ZEI (217 HP) has 64 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Westfield ZEI should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Because 1983 Westfield ZEI is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Westfield ZEI. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Westfield ZEI (292 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1983 Westfield ZEI will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Westfield ZEI | 2012 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Westfield | Holden |
| Model | ZEI | Epica |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 292 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3550 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2700 mm |
