1984 Abarth A 112 vs. 1963 AC Aceca
To start off, 1984 Abarth A 112 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 AC Aceca weights approximately 209 kg more than 1984 Abarth A 112.
Because 1963 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Abarth A 112 | 1963 AC Aceca | |
| Make | Abarth | AC |
| Model | A 112 | Aceca |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1971 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 894 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2290 mm |
