1984 Abarth A 112 vs. 1964 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1984 Abarth A 112 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Zastava 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Zastava 1500 weights approximately 299 kg more than 1984 Abarth A 112.
Because 1964 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Abarth A 112 | 1964 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Abarth | Zastava |
Model | A 112 | 1500 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1964 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2430 mm |