1984 Abarth A 112 vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1984 Abarth A 112 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Lotus Elan weights approximately 11 kg more than 1984 Abarth A 112.
Because 1966 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Abarth A 112 | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Abarth | Lotus |
| Model | A 112 | Elan |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 696 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2240 mm |
