1984 Abarth A 112 vs. 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo
To start off, 1984 Abarth A 112 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo would be higher. At 1,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo weights approximately 363 kg more than 1984 Abarth A 112.
Because 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Abarth A 112 | 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo | |
| Make | Abarth | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | A 112 | Carabo |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 227 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1048 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1000 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2360 mm |
