1984 Abarth A 112 vs. 1999 MCC Smart
To start off, 1999 MCC Smart is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 965 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Abarth A 112 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 MCC Smart weights approximately 15 kg more than 1984 Abarth A 112.
Because 1999 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 1984 Abarth A 112 has manual transmission. 1984 Abarth A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Abarth A 112 | 1999 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Abarth | MCC |
| Model | A 112 | Smart |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1999 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 3230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2280 mm |
