1984 Abarth A 112 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 503 kg more than 1984 Abarth A 112.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Abarth A 112 | 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | A 112 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1984 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 5670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1188 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2570 mm |