1984 Abarth A 112 vs. 2002 AC Aceca
To start off, 2002 AC Aceca is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 AC Aceca weights approximately 825 kg more than 1984 Abarth A 112.
Because 2002 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Abarth A 112 | 2002 AC Aceca | |
Make | Abarth | AC |
Model | A 112 | Aceca |
Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 302 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2480 mm |