1984 Alfa Romeo 90 vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 215 kg more than 1984 Alfa Romeo 90.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Alfa Romeo 90. (203 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Alfa Romeo 90.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
| Model | 90 | XK |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2393 cc | 3441 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.9 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 106 mm |
| Top Speed | 199 km/hour | 201 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1295 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2600 mm |
