1984 Alfa Romeo 90 vs. 1962 Volvo 120
To start off, 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1962 Volvo 120.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 (203 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 120. (142 Nm). This means 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 | 1962 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
| Model | 90 | 120 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2393 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.9 mm | 84.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 80 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1010 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2610 mm |
