1984 Alfa Romeo 90 vs. 2002 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Alfa Romeo 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 372 kg more than 1984 Alfa Romeo 90.
Because 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Alfa Romeo 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler Sebring (226 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Alfa Romeo 90. (203 Nm). This means 2002 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Alfa Romeo 90. 2002 Chrysler Sebring has automatic transmission and 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 has manual transmission. 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Chrysler Sebring will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 | 2002 Chrysler Sebring | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chrysler |
| Model | 90 | Sebring |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2393 cc | 2343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 149 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 226 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.9 mm | 87.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 101 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1452 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2880 mm |
