1984 Alfa Romeo 90 vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Alfa Romeo 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 weights approximately 180 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio.
Because 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Alfa Romeo 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 (203 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (105 Nm). This means 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Alfa Romeo 90 | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Renault |
Model | 90 | Clio |
Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2393 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 73 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 105 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.9 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 76.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Top Speed | 199 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 900 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2480 mm |