1984 Alfa Romeo 90 vs. 2006 Cadillac XLR
To start off, 2006 Cadillac XLR is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Alfa Romeo 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 576 kg more than 1984 Alfa Romeo 90.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac XLR (420 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Alfa Romeo 90. (203 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Alfa Romeo 90.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 | 2006 Cadillac XLR | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 90 | XLR |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2393 cc | 4572 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 320 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 420 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.9 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 199 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1656 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2690 mm |
