1984 Alfa Romeo 90 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Alfa Romeo 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 455 kg more than 1984 Alfa Romeo 90.
Because 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Alfa Romeo 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 (203 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Epica. (195 Nm). This means 1984 Alfa Romeo 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Epica.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Alfa Romeo 90 | 2006 Chevrolet Epica | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 90 | Epica |
Year Released | 1984 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2393 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 142 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 195 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.9 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 75.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.2:1 |
Top Speed | 199 km/hour | 207 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1535 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2710 mm |