1984 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 vs. 1965 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1984 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1984 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6. (135 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1984 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 645 kg more than 1984 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 | 1965 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | Alfa 6 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 95 L |
