1984 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 vs. 1969 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1984 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1984 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6. (135 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1984 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 630 kg more than 1984 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 | 1969 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | Alfa 6 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 109.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66.2 mm | 103.1 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3300 mm |
