1984 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 vs. 1978 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1984 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 440 kg more than 1984 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6.
Because 1984 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Cadillac DeVille has automatic transmission and 1984 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 has manual transmission. 1984 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Cadillac DeVille will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 | 1978 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | Alfa 6 | DeVille |
Year Released | 1984 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 6028 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3090 mm |