1984 Alpine A 310 vs. 1952 Austin A 70
To start off, 1984 Alpine A 310 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Alpine A 310 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Alpine A 310 (149 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Alpine A 310 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 70 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1984 Alpine A 310.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Alpine A 310 | 1952 Austin A 70 | |
Make | Alpine | Austin |
Model | A 310 | A 70 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 2664 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 79.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 111.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 63 L |