1984 Alpine A 310 vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Alpine A 310. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Alpine A 310 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Alpine A 310 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 466 kg more than 1984 Alpine A 310.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Alpine A 310 (208 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (158 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1984 Alpine A 310 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Alpine A 310 | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Alpine | Toyota |
Model | A 310 | Condor |
Year Released | 1984 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 2664 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 208 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1446 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 70 L |