1984 Audi 200 vs. 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn
To start off, 1984 Audi 200 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn would be higher. At 4,255 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn weights approximately 540 kg more than 1984 Audi 200.
Because 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 200 | 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn | |
Make | Audi | Rolls-Royce |
Model | 200 | Silver Dawn |
Year Released | 1984 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 4255 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
Top Speed | 230 km/hour | 139 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 108 L |