1984 Audi 200 vs. 1954 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1984 Audi 200 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 740 kg more than 1984 Audi 200.
Because 1954 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1954 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1984 Audi 200 has manual transmission. 1984 Audi 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1954 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 200 | 1954 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 200 | 62 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 5423 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 267 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3290 mm |