1984 Audi 200 vs. 1965 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1984 Audi 200 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1984 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Audi 200 weights approximately 876 kg more than 1965 Mazda R 360.
Because 1965 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 200 | 1965 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | 200 | R 360 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 356 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 16 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 384 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 1770 mm |