1984 Audi 200 vs. 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite
To start off, 1984 Audi 200 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1984 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Audi 200 | 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | |
| Make | Audi | Austin-Healey |
| Model | 200 | Sprite |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1350 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 27 L |
