1984 Audi 200 vs. 1967 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1984 Audi 200 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1984 Audi 200. (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 735 kg more than 1984 Audi 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 200 | 1967 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 200 | DeVille |
Year Released | 1984 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 2025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 82 L |