1984 Audi 200 vs. 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
To start off, 1984 Audi 200 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 285 kg more than 1984 Audi 200.
Because 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Audi 200 | 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | 200 | Monte Carlo |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 3790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1545 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2750 mm |
