1984 Audi 200 vs. 1982 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1984 Audi 200 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 4,080 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1982 Cadillac Eldorado. (123 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1982 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 350 kg more than 1984 Audi 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Cadillac Eldorado (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 200. (253 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1982 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 200 | 1982 Cadillac Eldorado | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 200 | Eldorado |
Year Released | 1984 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 4080 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 253 Nm | 257 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2900 mm |