1984 Audi 200 vs. 1983 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1984 Audi 200 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1984 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Audi 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Audi 200 (253 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1984 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 200 | 1983 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | 200 | CJ |
Year Released | 1984 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 253 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2380 mm |