1984 Audi 200 vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1984 Audi 200 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1984 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Audi 200 weights approximately 520 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1984 Audi 200 (253 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1984 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 200 | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | 200 | 102 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 253 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2160 mm |