1984 Audi 200 vs. 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 36 kg more than 1984 Audi 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 200 | 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
Model | 200 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1984 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2680 mm |