1984 Audi 200 vs. 1992 Ford Falcon

To start off, 1992 Ford Falcon is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 200 would be higher. At 3,948 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1992 Ford Falcon. (161 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Falcon weights approximately 155 kg more than 1984 Audi 200.

Because 1992 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Falcon (311 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 200. (253 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 200.

Compare all specifications:

1984 Audi 200 1992 Ford Falcon
Make Audi Ford
Model 200 Falcon
Year Released 1984 1992
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2144 cc 3948 cc
Engine Cylinders 5 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 180 HP 161 HP
Engine RPM 5700 RPM 4250 RPM
Torque 253 Nm 311 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 3250 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1290 kg 1445 kg
Vehicle Length 4810 mm 4820 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 2800 mm