1984 Audi 200 vs. 1993 Renault Clio
To start off, 1993 Renault Clio is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1984 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1993 Renault Clio. (148 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Audi 200 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1993 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1984 Audi 200 (253 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Renault Clio. (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1984 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 200 | 1993 Renault Clio | |
Make | Audi | Renault |
Model | 200 | Clio |
Year Released | 1984 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 253 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 93 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |