1984 Audi 200 vs. 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star
To start off, 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1984 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star. (120 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star weights approximately 25 kg more than 1984 Audi 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Audi 200 (253 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star. (174 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1984 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 200 | 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | 200 | Space Star |
Year Released | 1984 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 253 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1315 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2510 mm |