1984 Audi 200 vs. 2000 Marcos Mantis
To start off, 2000 Marcos Mantis is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 200 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Marcos Mantis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Marcos Mantis (506 HP) has 326 more horse power than 1984 Audi 200. (180 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Marcos Mantis should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 200.
Because 2000 Marcos Mantis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Marcos Mantis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Marcos Mantis (613 Nm) has 360 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 200. (253 Nm). This means 2000 Marcos Mantis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 200 | 2000 Marcos Mantis | |
Make | Audi | Marcos |
Model | 200 | Mantis |
Year Released | 1984 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 506 HP |
Torque | 253 Nm | 613 Nm |
Top Speed | 230 km/hour | 283 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2290 mm |