1984 Audi 200 vs. 2000 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Mazda 626 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1984 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Audi 200 weights approximately 20 kg more than 2000 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 200 | 2000 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | 200 | 626 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2680 mm |