1984 Audi 200 vs. 2002 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 430 kg more than 1984 Audi 200.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Audi 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Audi 200 (253 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ranger. (207 Nm). This means 1984 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 200 | 2002 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 200 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 253 Nm | 207 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 55 L |