1984 Audi 200 vs. 2003 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2003 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 250 kg more than 1984 Audi 200.
Because 2003 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Audi 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 200 | 2003 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | 200 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1984 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 141 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2380 mm |