1984 Audi 200 vs. 2005 Eagle Vision
To start off, 2005 Eagle Vision is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1984 Audi 200. (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Eagle Vision weights approximately 280 kg more than 1984 Audi 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Eagle Vision has automatic transmission and 1984 Audi 200 has manual transmission. 1984 Audi 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Eagle Vision will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 200 | 2005 Eagle Vision | |
Make | Audi | Eagle |
Model | 200 | Vision |
Year Released | 1984 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |