1984 Audi 200 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,486 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (169 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1984 Audi 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Audi 200 (253 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1984 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 200 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | 200 | 6 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2486 cc |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 253 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 100 mm |
Top Speed | 230 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 64 L |