1984 Audi 200 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 200 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Audi 200 (253 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1984 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Audi 200 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | 200 | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 253 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4437 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2619 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 57 L |
