1984 Audi 200 vs. 2010 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XK is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 200 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XK weights approximately 493 kg more than 1984 Audi 200.
Because 2010 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Jaguar XK has automatic transmission and 1984 Audi 200 has manual transmission. 1984 Audi 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jaguar XK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 200 | 2010 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | 200 | XK |
Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 510 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1753 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4793 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1321 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2751 mm |