1984 Audi 200 vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,606 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2010 Mazda BT-50. (123 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda BT-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1984 Audi 200.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Audi 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Audi 200 (253 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda BT-50. (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1984 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda BT-50.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 200 | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | 200 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 253 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 50 L |