1984 Audi 200 vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 200 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Audi 200 weights approximately 120 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Because 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Audi 200 | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
| Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 200 | i-MiEV |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3678 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1585 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1615 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2550 mm |
